Who is better in Star Wars or halo?īut the Star Wars army was on a a multi galaxy scale, storm troopers was absolutely everywhere. A lightsaber is (in my opinion) more powerful than the energy sword used by the Elites, so it could easily cut through Chief’s armor. Outside of force choke though, Master Chief has Vader beat as far as I can see. Star Wars, on the other hand, goes WAY too deep into a character’s journey. Halo focuses on making things as accurate and consistent as possible, focusing more on the events and the characters’ journey, following their paths and elaborating their views on current major events. Chief’s augmentations make him inhuman, and with his suit it multiples these augmentations 100x. Simple answer is that the Only way Vader (whom I love) would win, is if he was allowed to use the force, without it Chief outclasses him in every way even without his suit. Who would win Darth Vader or Master Chief? As a result, the events of Halo and First Strike would have played out differently, if at all, meaning that the Covenant would likely still have the giant fleet at the Unyielding Hierophant, which would most likely have made its way to Earth. If the UNSC had won at Reach, the Covenant would have lost Thel’s fleet. What if the UNSC won the battle of reach?
Guns in Star Wars aren’t very advanced compared to Halo. The empire likely wouldn’t care about the infection when it’s isolated to a single backwater planet, so they wouldn’t use the Death Star right away. What if the flood was in Star Wars?įlood would curbstomp the imperial forces. They are certainly both unique in their own right, and are both adored by respective fans. But, other than that, Star Wars is the winner in this clash. If Halo was able to shoot Star Wars forces down before ever coming face to face, they may win. Halo is known for its strategic edge over their enemies.
Which is better, the banshee or the Halo?.Who would win Darth Vader or Master Chief?.What if the UNSC won the battle of reach?.
0 kommentar(er)
